JOMPAC

Journal of Medicine and Palliative Care (JOMPAC) is an open access scientific journal with independent, unbiased, and double-blind review under international guidelines. The purpose of JOMPAC is to contribute to the literature by publishing articles on health sciences and medicine.

EndNote Style
Index
Original Article
Trends in pediatric kidney stone research between 2004-2023: a bibliometric study
Aims: The purpose of this current investigation is twofold: first, to review the available literature published in the last twenty years on pediatric nephrolithiasis; and second, to evaluate the progression of research on this topic during the indicated period. In this respect, through bibliometric analysis the present study aims to reveal trends, crucial authors, important institutions and outstanding journals of this line of research. It also takes an attempt to compare the increasing trend of publication productivity and citation frequency and the distribution of the research outputs across the countries/regions of the world to map the progress and potential prospects of pediatric kidney stone research.
Methods: The present study aimed to perform a bibliometric analysis of knowledge production. In pediatric kidney stone from 2004 to 2023 using WoS Core Collection. Articles were searched using the term “Kidney Stones in Children” including all articles, reviews and papers indexed, reviews and conference papers. The examination focused on the overall publication output, number of citations received, and journal citation; with methods including keyword frequency, bibliographic coupling, co-citation analysis, and co-authorship networks. Element positions, co-occurrence frequencies, and clusters were developed from the data source by using VOSviewer software. The study covered publication distribution, citation behaviour, keyword frequencies, and collaboration map.
Results: According to the presented research, the level of academic interest in this topic has risen dramatically over the years, and its popularity peaked in 2020. This result is expected because leading academic centres and name-referenced universities like University of Pennsylvania and Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia contributed significantly to the current literature. Ten most preferred journals are Journal of Urology, Journal of Pediatric Urology and many more. The findings reveal the overall international cooperation with especial emphasis on relations between institutions in the US and European countries. Carrying out the keyword analysis, authors have determined that “urolithiasis”, “nephrolithiasis”, and “kidney stones” are the most topical concerns. Aside from general surgery, much of the most frequently cited research is relevant to surgical practices and dietary recommendations. The purpose of this review is to enhance the understanding of the tendencies of the studies the most active contributors and cooperation patterns in the pediatric kidney stones.
Conclusion: This bibliometric analysis reveals a significant rise in pediatric kidney stones research, peaking in 2020. Key contributors include the University of Pennsylvania and the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, with strong international collaborations. Original research articles and top journals, like the Journal of Urology, remain central. The U.S. leads in contributions, with notable input from Turkish institutions.


1. Scales CD Jr, Smith AC, Hanley JM, Saigal CS, Urologic diseases in America P. Prevalence of kidney stones in the United States. <em>Eur Urol.</em> 2012;62(1):160-165.
2. Worcester EM, Coe FL. Clinical practice. Calcium kidney stones. <em>N Engl J Med.</em> 2010;363(10):954-963.
3. Kusumi K, Becknell B, Schwaderer A. Trends in pediatric urolithiasis: patient characteristics, associated diagnoses, and financial burden. <em>Pediatr Nephrol.</em> 2015;30(5):805-810.
4. Sharma AP, Filler G. Epidemiology of pediatric urolithiasis. <em>Indian J Urol.</em> 2010;26(4):516-522.
5. Sas DJ, Hulsey TC, Shatat IF, Orak JK. Increasing incidence of kidney stones in children evaluated in the emergency department. <em>J Pediatr.</em> 2010;157(1):132-137.
6. Fakheri RJ, Goldfarb DS. Ambient temperature as a contributor to kidney stone formation: implications of global warming. <em>Kidney Int.</em> 2011;79(11):1178-1185.
7. Brikowski TH, Lotan Y, Pearle MS. Climate-related increase in the prevalence of urolithiasis in the United States. <em>Proc Natl Acad Sci.</em> 2008;105(28):9841-9846.
8. Safarinejad MR. Adult urolithiasis in a population-based study in Iran: prevalence, incidence, and associated risk factors. <em>Urol Res.</em> 2007;35(2):73-82.
9. Halbritter J, Baum M, Hynes AM, et al. Fourteen monogenic genes account for 15% of nephrolithiasis/nephrocalcinosis. <em>J Am Soc Nephrol.</em> 2015;26(3):543-551.
10. Halbritter J, Seidel A, Muller L, Schonauer R, Hoppe B. Update on hereditary kidney stone disease and introduction of a new clinical patient registry in Germany. <em>Front Pediatr.</em> 2018;6:47
11. Edvardsson VO, Ingvarsdottir SE, Palsson R, Indridason OS. Incidence of kidney stone disease in Icelandic children and adolescents from 1985 to 2013: results of a nationwide study. <em>Pediatr Nephrol.</em> 2018;33(8):1375-1384.
12. Tasian GE, Ross ME, Song L, et al. Annual incidence of nephrolithiasis among children and adults in South Carolina from 1997 to 2012. <em>Clin J Am Soc Nephrol.</em> 2016;11(3):488-496.
13. Rizvi SAH, Naqvi SAA, Hussain Z, et al. Pediatric urolithiasis: developing nation perspectives. <em>J. Urol.</em> 2002;168(4):1522-1525.
14. Milliner DS, Murphy ME. Urolithiasis in pediatric patients. <em>Mayo Clin Proc.</em> 1993;68(3):241-248.
15. &Uuml;ntan İ, &Uuml;ntan S, Tosun H, Demirci, D. Metabolic risk factors and the role of prophylaxis in pediatric urolithiasis. <em>J Pediatr Urol,</em> 2021;17(2):215-e1.
16. Minevich E. Pediatric urolithiasis. <em>Pediatr. Clin.</em> 2001;48(6):1571-1585.
17. Passas I. Bibliometric analysis: the main steps. <em>Encyclopedia</em>. 2024;4(2):1014-1025.
18. Van Eck N, Waltman L. Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. <em>Scientometrics.</em> 2010;84(2): 523-538.
19. Khalil GM, Crawford CAG. A bibliometric analysis of US-based research on the behavioral risk factor surveillance system. <em>AJPM Focus.</em> 2015;48(1):50-57.
20. Chen S, Zhang T, Zhang J, Current status and prospects of pediatric stone disease: a bibliometric and visualization study. <em>Cureus.</em> 2024;16(3):e56549.
21. Ghidini F, Castagnetti M. Pediatric urology research in 2020: a bibliometric analysis of the top 100 most cited articles. <em>Urologia J</em>. 2022;89(3): 474-480.
22. Matta R, Schaeffer AJ. The top 100 cited articles in pediatric urology: a bibliometric analysis. <em>J Pediatr Urol.</em> 2021;17(5): 709-e1.
23. Pedroza VM, Solano C, Sierra MJ, et al. Cardiovascular risk and urolithiasis: underestimated or unknown relationship? <em>Insight Urology</em>. 2024;45(1):42-51.
24. Zyoud SEH, Abushamma F, Salameh H, et al. Exploring the nutritional landscape and emerging trends in kidney stone research: visualization and bibliometric analysis. <em>Transl. Med. Commun.</em> 2024;9(1):8.
25. Siener R, Metzner C. Dietary weight loss strategies for kidney stone patients. <em>WorldJ Urol</em>. 2023;41(5):1221-1228.
26. Abushamma F, Zyoud, SEH. Analyzing global research trends and focal points in the utilization of laser techniques for the treatment of urolithiasis from 1978 to 2022: visualization and bibliometric analysis. <em>Urol.</em> 2024;52(1): 67.
27. Dong C, Song C, He Z, et al. An overview of global research landscape in etiology of urolithiasis based on bibliometric analysis. <em>Urol.</em> 2023;51(1):71.
28. Tan S, Yuan D., Su H, et al. Prevalence of urolithiasis in China: a systematic review and meta-analysis. <em>BJUInt</em>. 2024;133(1):34-43.
29. Nedbal C, Cerrato C, Jahrreiss V, et al.Trends of &ldquo;artificial ıntelligence, machine learning, virtual reality, and radiomics in urolithiasis&rdquo; over the last 30 years (1994-2023) as published in the literature (PubMed): a comprehensive review. <em>J Endourol</em>. 2024;38(8): 788-798.
30. Fern&aacute;ndez N, Herrera DAV, Villanueva J, et al. Publication trends in pediatric stone disease: a bibliometric analysis. <em>Colomb Urol J.</em> 2022;31(03):e102-e108.
31. Sun G, Liu C. Song C, et al. Knowledge mapping of UMOD of English published work from 1985 to 2022: a bibliometric analysis. <em>Int Urol Nephrol.</em> 2024;56(1):249-261.
32. Wei N, Hu Y, Liu G, et al. A bibliometric analysis of familial hypercholesterolemia from 2011 to 2021. <em>Curr Probl Cardiol</em>. 2023;48(7):101151.
33. Yuvan&ccedil; E, Yilmaz E, Tuglu D, Batislam E. Medical and alternative therapies in urinary tract stone disease. <em>World J Nephrol</em>. 2015; 4(5):492-499.
34. Julieb&oslash;-Jones P, Keller EX, Tzelves L, et al. Paediatric kidney stone surgery: state-of-the-art review. <em>Ther Adv Urol</em>, 2023;15: 17562872231159541.
35. Beşer İ, Yuvan&ccedil; E, Yılmaz E. The effectiveness of modified stone recurrence predictive score in predicting recurrence of urinary stone disease.<em>J Compr Surg</em>,2023;<em>1</em>(3): 49-52.
36. Kumar B, Dhua AK, Goel P, et al. Pediatric UTI research: trends, collaborations, and hotspot topics-a bibliometric analysis. <em>Life Res</em>. 2024;7(4):17.
37. Ramakrishnan J, Sankar, GR, Thavamani, K. Bibliometric evaluation of literature within the area of pediatric urology. <em>Int J Inf Dissemin Technol.</em> 2022;12(2):53-61.
Volume 5, Issue 5, 2024
Page : 265-276
_Footer