JOMPAC
Journal of Medicine and Palliative Care

Journal of Medicine and Palliative Care (JOMPAC) is an open access scientific journal with independent, unbiased, and double-blind review under international guidelines. The purpose of JOMPAC is to contribute to the literature by publishing articles on health sciences and medicine.

eISSN: 2717-7505
Creative Commons CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 International License.
EndNote Style

Submit Manuscript

Index
Original Article
How does mortality affect sustainable development goals?
Abstract
Aims: The aim of this study was to reveal the relationship between the sustainable development indicators index score and mortality, including maternal deaths, deaths under the age of five (u5mortality) traffic deaths, and death of non-communicable disease (NCD mortality).
Methods: Panel data method was used in the analyses, mortality rates independent variables belonging to 11 OECD countries with regular data between 2000-2020; sustainable development indicators index score was considered as the dependent variable.
Results: According to the results of the least squares analysis, a 1% increase in maternal mortality reduced the sustainable development index score by 0.021%; a 1% increase in under five years mortality reduced the sustainable development index score by 0.037%; a 1% increase in NCD mortality reduced the sustainable development index score by 0.044%; a 1% increase in trafficmortality reduced the sustainable development index score by 0.016% (p<0.01). A Granger-type causality relationship was identified in different directions between the Sustainable Development Index score and various types of mortality. Additionally, it has been observed that the variables exhibit a long-term relationship. The results of this research explain that long-term mortality rates account for approximately 10% of all sustainable development-related indicators, emphasizing that a healthy social structure is a fundamental requirement for the sustainable development of countries.
Conclusion: Therefore, according to the empirical evidence obtained from the research, the increase in mortality negatively affects the SDG index score in the countries under analysis.

Keywords : Econometric evaluation, sustainable development goals, mortality

Download Article


1. Rabie M. Meaning of development, a theory of sustainablesociocultural and economic development. 1st edition. New York:Palgrave Macmillan US (2016) ISBN:978-1-349-88759-0
2. Meadows DH, Meadows DL, Randers J, Behrens WW. THELimits To Growth: A Report For The Club Of Rome&rsquo;s ProjectOn The Predicament Of Mankind. New York Universe Books(1972) https://doi.org/10.1349/ddlp.https://www.clubofrome.org/publication/the-limits-to-growth/
3. Erkol M, Artun H, Temur A, Okur M. 3E, 5E ve FeTeMM iledesteklenmiş &ouml;ğrenme ortamının s&uuml;rd&uuml;r&uuml;lebilir kalkınmakonusuna etkisi. J Comp Educat Res. 2022;10(19):73-102.
4. United Nations. Transforming Our World: The 2030 AgendaFor Sustainable Development. Department of Economic AndSocial Affairs United Nations. 2015. Available at: https://sdgs.un.org/publications/transforming-our-world-2030-agenda-sustainabledevelopment-17981.
5. Sachs JD, Lafortune G, Fuller G, Drumm E. Implementing theSDG stimulus. Sustainable Development Report 2023. DublinUniversity Press (2023) 10.25546/102924
6. Chen L, Duan D, Han L, et al. Non-communicable disease-relatedsustainable development goals for 66 belt and road ınitiativecountries. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2023;12(6172):1-12.
7. Kc A, Jha AK, Shrestha MP, Zhou H, Gurung A, Thapa J,Budhathoki SS. Trends for neonatal deaths in nepal (2001-2016)to project progress towards the sdg target in 2030, and risk factoranalyses to focus action. Matern Child Health J. 2020;24(1):5-14.
8. Adeyinka DA, Muhajarine N, Petrucka P, et al. Inequities inchild survival in Nigerian communities during the SustainableDevelopment Goal era: insights from analysis of 2016/2017Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey. BMC Public Health. 2020;20:1613.
9. Baltagi BH. Econometric Analysis Of Panel Data. 3rd ed. JohnWiley and Sons, New York (2005) ISBN-13 978-0-470-01456-1.
10. Tun&ccedil; Z. En k&uuml;&ccedil;&uuml;k kareler ve temel bileşenler regresyonanalizlerinin karşılaştırılması. İn&ouml;n&uuml; &Uuml;niversitesi Sağlık BilimleriEnstit&uuml;s&uuml; Biyoistatistik ve Tıp Bilişimi Anabilim Dalı Y&uuml;ksekLisans Tezi. 2018:1-70.
11. Granger CWJ. Investigating causal relations by econometricmodels and cross-spectral method. Econometrica. 1969;37(3):424-438.
12. Lewin A, Lin CF, Chu CSJ. Unit root tests in panel data: asymptoticand nite-sample properties. J Econometric. 2002;108(1):1-24.
13. Im K, Peseran MH, Shin Y. Testing for unit roots in heterogeneouspanels. J Econometrics. 2009;115(1):53-74.
14. Aky&uuml;z HE. Vekt&ouml;r otoregresyon (var) modeli ile iklimseldeğişkenlerin istatistiksel analizi. Ulusl M&uuml;hendislik AraştGeliştirme Derg. 2018;10(2):183-192.
15. Lusting N. Investing in health for economic development: thecase of Mexico. Helsinki: Wider Research Paper. The UnitedNations University World Institute for Development EconomicsResearch. (2004). No. 2006/30. ISBN:9291907987.
16. Karag&uuml;l M. Beşeri sermayenin iktisadi gelişmedeki rol&uuml; veT&uuml;rkiye&rsquo;deki &ouml;nemi. Afyon: Afyonkarahisar Kocatepe &Uuml;niversitesiYayınları (2002) Yayın No: 37. 9757150487, 9789757150480.
17. Kartal T, Gursoy E. S&uuml;rd&uuml;r&uuml;lebilir kalkınma ama&ccedil;larında (2015-2030) emzirmenin &ouml;nemi ve T&uuml;rkiye&rsquo;deki mevcut durum ışığındahemşireye d&uuml;şen g&ouml;revler. Mersin &Uuml;ni Tıp Fak Lokman Hekim TıpTarihi Folkl Tıp Derg. 2020;10(2):147-153.
18. Zulfiqar A, Bhutta MB, Black RE. Global maternal, newborn,and child health&mdash;so near and yet so far. New England J Med.2013;(369):2226-2235.
19. Pritchett L, Summers L. Wealthier is healthier. J Human Resour.1996;31(4):841-868.
20. Say L, Chou D, Gemmill A, et al. Global causes of maternal health:a WHO systematic review. Lancet Global Health. 2014;2(6):e323-e333.
21. Morrison J, Malik SMMR. Population health trends and diseaseprofile in Somalia 1990-2019, and projection to 2030: will thecountry achieve sustainable development goals 2 and 3? BMCPublic Health. 2023;(23):66.
22. Lee Y, Kim SY. Public health law coverage in support of thehealth-related sustainable development goals (SDGs) among 33Western Pacific countries. Globalization Health. 2019;(15):29.
23. Biermann F, Hickmann T, S&eacute;nıt CA. The political impact of thesustainable development goals; transforming governance throughglobal goals? Cambridge University Press (2022) Available at:www.cambridge.org/9781316514290
24. Daher-Nashif S, Bawadi H. Women&rsquo;s health and well-being in theunited nations sustainable development goals: a narrative reviewof achievements and gaps in the gulf states. Int J Environ ResPublic Health. 2020;17(3):1059.
25. Sharrow D, Hug L, You D, et al. Global, regional, and nationaltrends in under-5 mortality between 1990 and 2019 withscenario-based projections until 2030: a systematic analysisby the UN Inter-agency Group for Child Mortality Estimation.Lancet Global Health. 2022;10(2):e195-e206.
Article available in :
Volume 4, Issue 6, 2023
Page : 642-650
https://doi.org/10.47582/jompac.1341478
Article Information
Received : 11 Ağu 2023
Accepted : 12 Ara 2023
Published : 31 Ara 2023
Corresponding Author :

Gülay Ekinci: Department Health Management, Faculty of Health Sciences, İstanbul Sabahattin Zaim University, İstanbul, Turkey

[email protected]
Citation : Ekinci G. How does mortality affect sustainable development goals?. J Med Palliat Care. 2023;4(6):642-650.

Read: -4
Cited: 0
Download : 81
_Footer