JOMPAC
Journal of Medicine and Palliative Care

Journal of Medicine and Palliative Care (JOMPAC) is an open access scientific journal with independent, unbiased, and double-blind review under international guidelines. The purpose of JOMPAC is to contribute to the literature by publishing articles on health sciences and medicine.

eISSN: 2717-7505
Creative Commons CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 International License.
EndNote Style

Submit Manuscript

Index
Original Article
Evaluation of attitudes, behaviors and knowledge levels of students of functional foods
Abstract
Aims: This study aimed to determine the knowledge level of students studying functional foods at a public university in Malatya and to evaluate the factors affecting their attitudes and behaviors.
Methods: A total of 618 individuals (363 female and 255 male) studying at universities in Malatya were included in this study. Data were collected using a face-to-face survey. The questionnaire consisted of questions about demographic characteristics, eating habits, general health, anthropometric measurements (body weight and height), functional food knowledge level, and food preference scale sections. The data were analyzed using SPSS.
Results: The mean age of the participants was 24.45±2.18 years. It was determined that 65.04% of the individuals had heard of the term functional food. The YETBID-Basic Nutritional Knowledge Scores were higher in females (54.66±8.85) than males (51.14±8.22) (p=0.031). Individuals’ knowledge attitude scale confidence subheading score for functional foods was higher in female (3.95±1.04) than in male (3.15±1.04) (p=0.044). It was observed that as the basic nutrition score increased in both female and male, the score on the attitude scale towards functional foods also increased. In the multiple regression analysis, it was determined that the total score of the attitude scale towards functional foods was significantly affected by the variables of female (sex), duration of education, basic nutrition score, and food preference score (p<0.05).
Conclusion: It was determined that as the education level of the individuals increased, their level of basic nutrition knowledge increased, which affected their attitude towards functional foods. It has been determined that female have higher nutritional knowledge levels than male, find functional foods more reliable, and are more inclined to consume them.

Keywords : Nutrition, knowledge level, functional foods

Download Article


1. Granato D, Barba FJ, Bursac Kovacevic D, Lorenzo JM, Cruz AG,Putnik P. Functional foods: product development, technologicaltrends, efficacy testing, and safety. Annu Rev Food Sci Technol.2020;11:93-118.
2. Baker MT, Lu P, Parrella JA, Leggette HR. Consumer acceptancetoward functional foods: a scoping review. Int J Environ ResPublic Health. 2022;19(3):1217.
3. Alkhatib A. Antiviral functional foods and exercise lifestyleprevention of coronavirus. Nutrients. 2020;12(9):2633.
4. Nazir M, Arif S, Khan RS, Nazir W, Khalid N, Maqsood S.Opportunities and challenges for functional and medicinalbeverages: Current and future trends. Trends Food Sci Technol.2019;88:513-526.
5. Aguiar LM, Geraldi MV, Cazarin CBB, Junior MRM. Functionalfood consumption and its physiological effects. Bioactivecompounds: Elsevier; 2019;205-225.
6. Baker MT, Lu P, Parrella JA, Leggette HR. Investigating the effectof consumers&rsquo; knowledge on their acceptance of functional foods:a systematic review and meta-analysis. Foods. 2022;11(8):1135.
7. Noce A, Di Lauro M, Di Daniele F, et al. Natural bioactivecompounds useful in clinical management of metabolicsyndrome. Nutrients. 2021;13(2):630.
8. Ali A, Rahut DB. Healthy foods as proxy for functional foods:consumers&rsquo; awareness, perception, and demand for naturalfunctional foods in Pakistan. Int J Food Sci. 2019;2019:6390650.
9. Karelakis C, Zevgitis P, Galanopoulos K, Mattas K. Consumertrends and attitudes to functional foods. J Int Food AgribusinessMarket. 2020;32(3):266-294.
10. Alongi M, Anese M. Re-thinking functional food developmentthrough a holistic approach. J Function Foods. 2021;81:104466.
11. Weir CB, Jan A. BMI classification percentile and cut off points.StatPearls Publishing. 2019.
12. Urala N, L&auml;hteenm&auml;ki L. Consumers&rsquo; changing attitudes towardsfunctional foods. Food Qual Preference. 2007;18(1):1-12.
13. Batmaz H, G&uuml;neş E. Development of A Nutrition KnowledgeLevel Scale For Adults and ValidationReliability Study. Master&rsquo;sThesis, Marmara University. 2018.
14. Sikand G, Kris-Etherton P, Boulos NM. Impact of functionalfoods on prevention of cardiovascular disease and diabetes. CurrCardiol Rep. 2015;17:1-16.
15. Martirosyan D. The emerging potential of functional foodsin viral disease prevention. Bioactive Compounds Health Dis.2020;3(6):95-99.
16. Papp-Bata &Aacute;, Csiki Z, Szak&aacute;ly Z. Consumer behavior towardfunctional foods. The role of authentic information. OrvosiHetilap. 2018;159(30):1221-1225.
17. Nystrand BT, Olsen SO. Consumers&rsquo; attitudes and intentionstoward consuming functional foods in Norway. Food QualPreference. 2020;80:103827.
18. Hudak KM, Racine EF, Schulkind L. An increase in SNAPbenefits did not impact food security or diet quality in youth. JAcad Nutr Diet. 2021;121(3):507-519. e12.
19. Sogari G, Velez-Argumedo C, G&oacute;mez MI, Mora C. Collegestudents and eating habits: A study using an ecological model forhealthy behavior. Nutrients. 2018;10(12):1823.
20. Almoraie NM, Saqaan R, Alharthi R, Alamoudi A, Badh L,Shatwan IM. Snacking patterns throughout the life span: potentialimplications on health. Nutr Res. 2021;91:81-94.
21. Gok I, Ulu EK. Functional foods in Turkey: marketing, consumerawareness and regulatory aspects. Nutr Food Sci. 2019;49(4):668-686.
22. Gonz&aacute;lez-D&iacute;az C, Vilaplana-Aparicio MJ, Iglesias-Garc&iacute;a M. Howis functional food advertising understood? an approximation inuniversity students. Nutrients. 2020;12(11):3312.
23. Chen P-J, Antonelli M. Conceptual models of food choice:influential factors related to foods, individual differences, andsociety. Foods. 2020;9(12):1898.
24. Y&uuml;cel EK, Ozkan P, Y&uuml;cel E. The relationship between consumerinnovativeness and attitudes toward functional food: anapplication on university students. Int J Economic AdministrativeStud. 2018;265-280.
25. Annunziata A, Vecchio R. Functional foods development in theEuropean market: A consumer perspective. J Function Foods.2011;3(3):223-228.
26. Markovina J, Cacic J, Gajdo&scaron; Kljusuric J, Kovacic D. Youngconsumers&rsquo; perception of functional foods in Croatia. Br Food J.2011;113(1):7-16.
27. Landstr&ouml;m E, Hursti U-KK, Magnusson M. &ldquo;Functional foodscompensate for an unhealthy lifestyle&rdquo;. Some Swedish consumers&rsquo;impressions and perceived need of functional foods. Appetite.2009;53(1):34-43.
28. Arayici ME, Yucel U, Ocek ZA. Knowledge and attitudes ofEge University midwifery, nutrition-dietetic, and nursingstudents about natural functional foods. J Basic Clin Health Sci.2020;4(3):364-370.
29. Ares G, G&aacute;mbaro A. Influence of gender, age and motivesunderlying food choice on perceived healthiness and willingnessto try functional foods. Appetite. 2007;49(1):148-158.
30. Chang M-K, Kim Y. Assessment of functional food consumptionamong the working women in Korea. Korean J Nutr. 2008:832-838.
31. Sevilmiş G, Olgun A, Artukoğlu M. A research on factors whichdetermines the effect of consumer decisions about functionalproducts: The case of Izmir. EGE J Agricultur Res. 2017;54(3):351-360.
Article available in :
Volume 4, Issue 5, 2023
Page : 555-560
https://doi.org/10.47582/jompac.1343562
Article Information
Received : 08 Eyl 2023
Accepted : 07 Eki 2023
Published : 27 Eki 2023
Corresponding Author :

Nurgül Arslan: Department of Nutrition and Dietetic, Faculty of Health Sciences, Dicle University, Diyarbakır, Turkey

[email protected]
Citation : Arslan N, Alataş H. Evaluation of attitudes, behaviors and knowledge levels of students of functional foods. J Med Palliat Care. 2023;4(5):555-560.

Read: 72
Cited: 0
Download : 126
_Footer