JOMPAC

Journal of Medicine and Palliative Care (JOMPAC) is an open access scientific journal with independent, unbiased, and double-blind review under international guidelines. The purpose of JOMPAC is to contribute to the literature by publishing articles on health sciences and medicine.

EndNote Style
Index
Original Article
Morphometric analysis and clinical significance of the os sacrum
Aims: The purpose of this study is to assess the architecture and clinical importance of the sacrum, which features the dorsal and pelvic nerves.
Methods: 32 os sacrum of adult Anatolians of undetermined gender were measured for this investigation. Sacrum maximum length, os sacrum maximum width, sacrum I vertebral body antero-posterior width, sacrum I vertebral body transverse width, sacral index, Auricular surface short arm, auricular surface long arm and auricular surface oblique arm, the measurements of pelvic surface linea transverse length and, the measurements of dorsal surface linea transverse length and the sacrum height from the dorsal surface are evaluated.
Results: Sacrum maximum length 103.30±10.03 mm, sacrum maximum width 108.40±6.10 mm, sacrum I vertebral body transverse width 47.00±5.00 mm, sacrum I vertebral body antero-posterior width 28.30±3.50 mm, sacral index 104.00±9.00, Auricular surface short arm 31.90±4.20 mm, Auricular surface long arm 39.40±4.80 mm, Auricular surface oblique arm 49.10±6.00 mm, the length measurements of dorsal surface distance respectively as mm; 36.72±0.37, 29.75±0.31, 26.53±0.33, 26.56±0.39, the length measurements of dorsal surface distance respectively as mm; 29.16±0.36, 27.16±0.33, 24.50±0.26, 24.38±0.24 and the sacrum height from the dorsal surface as 103.4±9.70 mm were calculated.
Conclusion: Clinically stated, understanding the architecture of the sacrum and taking morphometric measures of it are crucial to avoiding difficulties and the surgical intervention that will be used to treat disorders associated to the sacrum.


1. Taner D. Fonksiyonel anatomi ekstremiteler ve sırt bölgesi, 4.Baskı. Ankara: HYB Basım Yayın; 2009.
2. Simriti NS, Ashwani Sharma RM. Morphological andmorphometric study of dry human sacra in Jammu region. JKScience. 2017;19:154-156.
3. Arıncı K. Elhan A. Anatomi. 3. Baskı. Ankara: Güneş Kitabevi;2001.
4. Stranding S. Gray’s Anatomy. The anatomical basis of clinicalpractice. 41st Ed. London: Elsevier; 2016.
5. Hansen JT. Netter’s clinical anatomy. 4th Ed. Newyork: Elsevier;2018.
6. Duman T. Yetişkinlerde os sacrum’un çok kesitli bilgisayarlıtomografi ile morfometrik incelenmesi. Yüksek Lisans Tezi.Selçuk Üniversitesi, Konya; 2009.
7. Gövsa Gökmen F. Sistematik Anatomi. 1. Baskı. İzmir: GüvenKitabevi; 2003.
8. Yıldırım M. Topografik anatomi. 1. Baskı. İstanbul: Nobel TıpKitabevi; 2000.
9. Başaloğlu H, Turgut M, Taşer FA, Ceylan T, Başaloğlu HK,Ceylan AA. Morphometry of the sacrum for clinical use. SurgRadiol Anat. 2005;27(6):467-471. doi:10.1007/s00276-005-0036-1
10. Peretz AM, Hipp JA, Heggeness MH. The internal bonyarchitecture of the sacrum. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1998;23(9):971-974. doi:10.1097/00007632-199805010-00001
11. Koç T, Ertekin T, Acer N, Cinar S. Os sacrum kemiğininmorfometrik değerlendirilmesi ve eklem yüzey alanlarınınhesaplanması. Erciyes Üniv Sağ Bil Derg. 2014;23:67-73.
12. Kothapalli J, Velichety SD, Desai V and Zameer MR.Morphometric study of sexual dimorphism in adult sacra ofSouth Indian population. Int J of Biol Med Res. 2012;3:2076-81.
13. Janipati P, Kothapalli J, Shamsunder RV. Study of sacral index:comparison between different regional populations of India andabroad. Int J Anat Res. 2014;2(4):640-644.
14. Patel S, Nigam M, Mishra P and Waghmare CS. A study of sacralindex and its interpretation in sex determination in MadhyaPradesh. J Indian Acad Forensic Med. 2014;36:146-149.
15. Sachdeva K, Singla RK, Kalsey G and Sharma G. Role of sacrumin sexual dimorphisim A morphometric study. J Indian AcadForensic Med. 2011;33:206-210.
16. Singh SN, Sharma A, Magotra R. Morphological andmorphometric study of dry human sacra in Jammu region. JK Sci.2017;19:154-156.
17. Kumar A, Wishwakarma N. An anthropometric analysis of dryhuman sacrum:gender discrimination. Int J Sci Res. 2015;4:1305-1310.
18. Mustafa MS, Mahmoud OM, El Raouf HHA and Atef H.Morphometric study of sacral hiatus in adult human Egyptiansacra: Their significiance in caudal epidural anesthesia. Saudi JAnaesth. 2012;6:350-357.
19. Mishra SR, Singh PJ, Agrawal AK. Identification of sex of sacrumof Agra region. J Anat Soc India. 2003;52:132-136.
20. Sinha MB, Rathore M, Trivedi S and Siddiqui AU. Morphometryof first pedicle of sacrum and its clinical relevance. Int J HealthcBiomed Res. 2013;1:234-240.
21. Vasuki AKM, Sundaram KK, Nirmaladevi, Jamuna M, HebzibahDJ, Fenn TKA. Anatomical variations of sacrum and its clinicalsignificance. Int J Anat Res. 2016;4:1859-1863
22. Laishram D, Ghosh A, Shastri D. A study on the variations ofsacrum and its clinical significance. J Dent Med Sci. 2016;15:8-14.
23. Cheng JS, Song JK. Anatomy of the sacrum. Neurosurg Focus.2003;15:1-4.
24. Isaac UE, Ekanem TB, Igiri AO. Gender differentiation in theadult human sacrum and the subpubic angle among indigenes ofcross river and Akwa Ibom States of Nigeria using radiographicfilms. Anatomy J Africa. 2014;3:294-307.
25. Patel MM, Gupta BD, Singel TC. Sexing of sacrum by sacral indexand kimura’s base-wing index. JIAFM. 2005;27:5-9.
26. McGrath MC, Stringer MD. Bony landmarks in the sacralregion:the posterior superior iliac spine and the second dorsalsacral foramina:a potential guide for sonography. Surg RadiolAnat. 2011;33:279-286.
27. Dubory A, Bouloussa H, Riouallon G, et al. Wolff S. A computedtomographic anatomical study of the upper sacrum. Applicationfor a user guide of pelvic fixation with iliosacral screws in adultspinal deformity. Int Orthop. 2017;41(12):2543-2553. doi:10.1007/s00264-017-3580-5.
28. Banik S, Mohakud S, Sahoo S, Tripathy PR, Sidhu S, GaikwadMR. Comparative morphometry of the sacrum and its clinicalimplications: a retrospective study of osteometry in dry bonesand CT scan images in patients presenting with lumbosacralpathologies. Cureus. 2022;14(2):e22306. doi:10.7759/cureus.22306.
Volume 4, Issue 3, 2023
Page : 211-218
_Footer